Objective vs. Subjective Writing: Understanding the Difference

Part of this is a conscious decision by researchers, who generally strive to be objective in following the scientific method. It is important to recognize inherent biases in order to minimize them and their impacts on research findings. Objective information does not vary, whereas subjective information can vary greatly from person to person or day to day.

Some of this subjectivity is trivial, such as a preference for coffee over tea. Such trivial subjectivity either does not impact the validity of research or can be consciously dismissed if relevant to a study.

objective/ subjective

In opposition to philosopher René Descartes’ method of personal deduction, natural philosopher Isaac Newton applied the relatively objective scientific method to look for evidence before forming a hypothesis. Partially in response to Kant’s rationalism, logician Gottlob Frege applied objectivity to his epistemological and metaphysical philosophies. If reality exists independently of consciousness, then it would logically include a plurality of indescribable forms. Objectivity requires a definition of truth formed by propositions with truth value. An attempt of forming an objective construct incorporates ontological commitments to the reality of objects.

In science, objectivity, or the quality of being uninfluenced by individual perspectives or biases, is considered a major goal. Yet researchers are unavoidably individuals and therefore always subjective to some degree. For this reason, both natural and social sciences devote considerable effort to ensuring steps are taken to make research as objective as possible.

What do you mean by objectivity?

Objectivity is a noun that means a lack of bias, judgment, or prejudice. Maintaining one’s objectivity is the most important job of a judge. The opposite of objectivity is “subjectivity,” which is personal bias or opinion.

Examples of Objective and Subjective Writing

Direct or naïve realists rely on perception as key in observing objective reality, while instrumentalists hold that observations are useful in predicting objective reality. The concepts that encompass these ideas are important in the philosophy of science. Philosophies of mind explore whether objectivity relies on perceptual constancy.

These statements are exclusively based on the ideas or opinion of the person making it, as there is no universal truth. Objective refers to an unbiased and balanced statement that represents facts about something. The statement is not coloured by the past experiences, prejudices, perceptions, desires or knowledge of the speaker.

A central question in the distinction between objective and subjective thinking is then, whether the individual adapts reality to their thinking or do they accommodate and adapt their thinking to reality? Objectivity remains vital to science even as some researchers question its limits.

Subjectivity can actually be wrong, or far from the truth, whereas objectivity means being as close to the truth as possible. Often objectivity is used in a decision making process, whereas subjectivity should be considered, but less strongly so. The main difference between objectivity and subjectivity is in the way that these arguments are presented.

Plato considered geometry a condition of idealism concerned with universal truth. His contrasting between objectivity and opinion became the basis for philosophies intent on resolving the questions of reality, truth, and existence.

Objectivity is a philosophical concept of being true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination. A proposition is considered to have objective truth when its truth conditions are met without bias caused by a sentient subject. Scientific objectivity refers to the ability to judge without partiality or external influence, sometimes used synonymously with neutrality.

Definition of Objectivity in the Workplace

Scholars have identified a “funding effect” bias, noting that results of industry-funded studies consistently present the industry’s products more favorably than do results of research funded by outside parties. Examples include research funded by the tobacco industry that downplays the health effects of smoking and research funded by fossil-fuel companies that questions climate change. Critics claim that this apparent lack of objectivity threatens the integrity of scientific research.

In addition to basic subjective preferences, all researchers and all human subjects of research are subject to subtler biases, including sampling bias, cognitive bias, and cultural bias. These influences, which are typically unconscious and are thought to be deeply ingrained in human psychology, can detract from objectivity in powerful ways. For example, a white researcher living in a predominantly white town may recruit only white people for a study.

The pursuit of science implies that the facts will speak for themselves, even if they turn out to be different from what the investigator hoped. There are many situations in which objective and subjective information can be more challenging to tell apart. A prime example of where to find subjective and objective styles right next to each other is in the newspaper. Reporters most generally hold themselves and their writing to a high level of objectivity. They present the facts and do not offer their own opinions when it comes to their presentation.

  • In opposition to philosopher René Descartes’ method of personal deduction, natural philosopher Isaac Newton applied the relatively objective scientific method to look for evidence before forming a hypothesis.
  • If reality exists independently of consciousness, then it would logically include a plurality of indescribable forms.

Education, training, and experience all push researchers to be as detached as possible from their individual preferences and perspectives. This quality, known as objectivity, is generally seen as critical to scientific research. The scientific method, with its insistence on testing and reproduction of results, is often considered a way to strive for objectivity. Subjective means those ideas or statements which are dominated by the personal feelings, opinion, preferences of the speaker.

Subjective means something which does not show the clear picture or it is just a person’s outlook or expression of opinion. A subjective point of view is characterised by the past experiences, knowledge, perceptions, understanding and desires of the specific person.

Because of major problems with conflicts of interest in research, significant interest has been directed toward the promotion of objectivity. Various academic, national, and international organizations have formed to uphold good research practices. Much research itself remains devoted to studying the causes and effects of objectivity, subjectivity, and bias. By better understanding the issues and their implications, scientists can better pursue truth. Regardless of their factual knowledge, every researcher approaches a project as an individual with unique perspectives that have evolved throughout their life experiences.

However, the editorial section of a newspaper is where one can find subjectivity. These articles can present the facts, in some cases the same as the objective ones, but will also include the writer’s viewpoint and opinion. The meaning of objectivity is easy to remember, when you see that the word “object” embedded within it. While it can be hard to show objectivity about people or pets, it’s easy to be more “objective” about objects.


I can show objectivity about a box of rocks; it’s much harder to show it with my dog. The opposite of objectivity is “subjectivity,” which is personal bias or opinion. There are many versions of ethical objectivism, including various religious views of morality, Platonistic intuitionism, Kantianism, utilitarianism, and certain forms of ethical egoism and contractualism. Note that Platonists define ethical objectivism in an even more narrow way, so that it requires the existence of intrinsic value. Consequently, they reject the idea that contractualists or egoists could be ethical objectivists.

He saw opinions as belonging to the shifting sphere of sensibilities, as opposed to a fixed, eternal and knowable incorporeality. Where Plato distinguished between how we know things and their ontological status, subjectivism such as George Berkeley’s depends on perception. In Platonic terms, a criticism of subjectivism is that it is difficult to distinguish between knowledge, opinions, and subjective knowledge. It is because this historian cannot back up the statements he makes with scientific proof that many people feel that historical knowledge is subjective rather than objective. The very subject matter of history being reflective thought such subjectivity become inevitable.

At the end of the discussion, objective information is one that produces the complete truth, i.e. it presents a story from all the angles in a systematic way. On the contrary, subjective information is coloured by the character of the person providing it. It is a great interpretation or analysis of the facts based on personal beliefs, opinion, perspective, feelings, etc. A neutral statement, which is completely true and real, unbiased and balanced, is an objective one.

This view holds that moral propositions are analogous to propositions about chemistry, biology, or history, in so much as they are true despite what anyone believes, hopes, wishes, or feels. When they fail to describe this mind-independent moral reality, they are false—no matter what anyone believes, hopes, wishes, or feels. The importance of perception in evaluating and understanding objective reality is debated in the observer effect of quantum mechanics.

The belief that natural science lends itself to objectivity while social science is more likely to be subjective remains common, even to the point of contention between the two broad fields. Yet it is apparent that objectivity is an important goal, if perhaps one impossible to fully achieve, across the sciences and beyond. It has important applications to other disciplines, from philosophy to international relations, and even to everyday life. As a concept, objectivity stands as a critical idea that illustrates the great complexity of human consciousness. An ongoing concern is whether or not it is possible for research conducted or sponsored by private, forprofit companies to be as objective as that undertaken by government or nonprofit organizations.

Subjective information – whether it is in written or spoken form – is generally considered to be a single person’s opinion. It has a viewpoint, or possibly a bias, regardless of the information it provides. Objective information on the other hand is meant to be completely unbiased. There is a feeling of the writer or speaker being outside of the information, and when they present it they do so without taking a stance or expressing their feelings in relation to that information. According to the ethical objectivist, the truth or falsehood of typical moral judgments does not depend upon the beliefs or feelings of any person or group of persons.

If the study is focused on a local phenomenon, this may not be problematic. Systematic bias can affect the development and structure of experiments, the accuracy of measurements, and the interpretation of results.

Objective And Subjective Use In Language

It is an interpretation of truth or reality, from the speaker’s angle, that informs and affects the judgement of people and is always biased. It can be a belief, opinion, rumour, assumption, suspicion, that is influenced by the speaker’s standpoint. o Objectivity means that all sources of bias are minimized and that personal or subjective ideas are eliminated.

What is an example of objectivity?

Objectivity aims to eliminate decisions based on personal bias, cultural differences and any other criterion that cannot be measured or proven. For example, a company could use its income statement to show that it is not doing well instead of the personal opinion of the chief executive.